On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:55:19PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2010-08-16 20:30, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I don't see why this is Debian-specific though. It really is an upstream issue, this should be documented as part of zexy, not Debian.

I think I understand now, and I agree with Hans. That documentation should go upstream, not in a debian readme.

while my other mail might sound a bit sarcastic, please note that i
totally agree.
but it's still true that current upstream doesn't handle it, and most likely there won't be an upstream (bugfix) release just to add a README.

so should the explanation be left out, or do you think it would be a
good idea to add a README via a patch?

It makes perfect sense to me to add a README.Debian for information as long as upstream lack certain documentation in their releases.

  - Jonas

  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to