On 16/08/10 19:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Aug 16, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returning to the
>>> Subject, I think pd-motex is ready for upload, thanks all for the
>> How are you editing debian/changelog? The timestamp is old!
> Ah, oops, I forgot dch. I've been using emacs. The changelog is still
> something I am somewhat confused by. I get the idea of course, but the
> not the specifics. I was under the impression that pkg-multimedia uses
> git-dch to automatically generate the changelog, so I stopped editing
> it. Also, since this package hasn't been released yet, should I still
> be adding things to the changelog?
Well, it depends on how many things you had to do. In this case, it
appears that not much (other than fixing minor mistakes not found in a
previous release). But you should still run dch. Please read the
manpage, specially the section about the release heuristics. I use the
changelog one, which seems to work well for our workflow.
>> Also, there is no need to ship the GPL text in the package. It seems
>> like no patch or file tries to read the license, so no need to ship it
>> (we already have the copyright file).
> The LICENSE.txt file is part of the standard library format.
Does anything break if we don't ship it?
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list