On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 00:22:25 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:

> On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;)  Returning to the
>> Subject, I think pd-motex is ready for upload, thanks all for the
>> feedback!
> How are you editing debian/changelog? The timestamp is old!
> Also, there is no need to ship the GPL text in the package. It seems
> like no patch or file tries to read the license, so no need to ship it
> (we already have the copyright file).

Uh, why do you want to have the LICENSE.txt file removed from the
upstream tarball? That seems rather blunt to me.

However, It is indeed formatted in an unusual way and lacks the preamble,
as well as the section "How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs".
Hans, maybe you can include the full text of the GPL-2 as found in
/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2 in a file named 'COPYING' in the next
release tarball? That's what the FSF commonly does.

Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to