On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:40:09PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > > >On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > >>On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > >>>On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 15:35:10 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner > >>>wrote: > >>>>README.txt and LICENSE.txt are part of the Pd library format. > >>>>They are part of the library, and the Help Browser (aka the > >>>>library browser) looks for them to display them. The library > >>>>format is basically a directory with files in it, and a subdir > >>>>called 'examples'. That install target actually serves to > >>>>enforce that all the standard files are there. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>In this library, I could replace the file with a symlink to > >>>>../../../ common-licenses/GPL-2, but other libraries might have > >>>>different licenses so this wouldn't always be the case. > >>> > >>>I guess that both the license and the README.txt actually belongs > >>>to /usr/share/doc/$package, that's what debian policy tells us to > >>>do. IIRC, documentation browsers like dhelp and the default > >>>webserver's configurations publish /usr/share/doc so that users > >>>can browse package documentation. > >>> > >>>So moving these files and symlink them to where the package > >>>expect them seems to me the right thing to do. > >> > >>This is wrong, actually: > >> > >>Code must not depend on /usr/share/doc existing on the machine, so > >>when a file is needed both by runtime and below /usr/share/doc then > >>the actual file should be placed elsewhere and a symlink be placed > >>below /usr/share/doc. > >> > >>Not sure if this is explicitly clarified in Debian Policy or only a > >>result of close-reading FHS (File Hierarchy Standard) or some such. > >>Perhaps look for sections regarding example scripts. > > > > > >In this context, I think the above suggestion makes the most sense. > >So here's my plan: > > > >- make the LICENSE.txt file into a symlink, if GPL, BSD or other > >common license > >- make usr/share/doc/pd-motex/README.txt a symlink to the one in the > >library > > > >I'd need to remove LICENSE.txt then make the symllnk. What's the > >best way to remove the file? I could patch the Makefile to remove > >the line in 'make install' that installs LICENSE.txt the add a link > >in debian/links. Is there some easy/proper way in debhelper to just > >remove an installed file? > > Your questions makes me suspect that you did not notice my earier > response in this thread (even earlier than above quoted one). > > Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:54:32 +0200 > Message-ID: <20100817095432.gg7...@jones.dk> > > There I describe how I do similarly with Sugar packages. > > To answer more directly to your questions: No, I believe there is no > debhelper routine specifically for this. Possibly you can make dh_link > force overwrite existing object, but I find my proposed approach of > replacing only if identical safer.
Ok, I did it with an 'rm' in debian/rules, hope that's ok. I pushed the commit. Also, FYI, I've been making all these changes to the other 25ish packages that I'm working on, so they should be pretty tight once I submit them. Once pd-motex is in, I am thinking of running one more thru individually, then once that's done, I'll submit the whole batch. Does that work? .hc _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list email@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers