On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:27:24 (CEST), Alessio Treglia wrote: > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@tauware.de> > wrote: >> Can you please explain this? On what basis do we want to build against >> jackd2 instead of jackd1? >> >> this indicates that dssi works also when built against jackd1. >> >> AFAIUI, we want to build all packages against jackd1, but have jackd2 >> installed by default. >> > > Of course I know, but I wanted simply to do some testing with a > version of dssi built against jackd2.
Oh, I see. > If something is wrong I can revert that change with my next upload to > experimental (I don't want to touch unstable for now). No, but I want to avoid that other maintainers pick up this as bad example espc. when they are unsure about the situation and don't know what to do. In the next upload, please properly document that this is an experiment for experimental(!) only and shouldn't be followed by anyone else without coordination on this list. I'm thinking about other downstream distros like ubuntu that are syncing from experimental as part of their workflow. But I guess you know the situation there better than I do. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers