On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:03:22AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 26/08/10 07:49, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:16:32AM +0000,
rosea-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
   changed in build-depends libjack-dev to libjack-dev |
libjack-jackd2-dev, assuming this is the right and new approach to
handle jack1 and jack2 in debian

- libjack-dev (>= 0.105),
+ libjack-dev | libjack-jackd2-dev,

No. Above means "one of these two *specific* implementations are required".

When you mean "any implementation is required", then instead use this:

  libjack-dev | libjack0.100.0-dev

No. Your solution means either libjack-dev or a virtual package we are trying to phase out (libjack0.100.0-dev).

We really need to sort this out, but for now packages should just build-depend on libjack-dev.

Ok.  My main point still stands :-)

Sorry for the confusion.

 - Jonas

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to