On 12/09/10 19:08, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 08:31:48PM +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
>> On 2010-09-12 12:32, Alessio Treglia wrote:
>>>> dpkg-buildpackage: full upload; Debian-native package (full source
>>>> is included)
>>>> Now running lintian...
>>>> W: fluidsynth source: debian-watch-file-in-native-package
>>>> W: fluidsynth source: native-package-with-dash-version
>>>> How do I avoid that?
>>> By switching to format 3.0 (quilt) [1], which allows us to strip
>>> upstream's debian directory without repacking the original tarball.
>> Hmm, upstream (as in the original 1.1.2 tarball) does not have a
>> debian directory...?
>> Second theory, can this be related to that I never updated the
>> changelog? I was unsure of how to that with git-dch and all these
>> semi-automatic tools expecting things to be in a certain way. (will
>> "dch -i" do?)
> Yes, this explains why git-buildpackage failed to generate a tarball
> from upstream + pristine-tar branches, and then (due to the lack of a
> tarball) dpkg-buildpackage assumed it was a native package and generated
> a tarball including (as is normal for native packages) the debian dir.
> And yes, a simple "dch", "dch -i" or "dch -r", possibly with some some
> hand-editing of the changelog file, should do the trick: The topmost
> changelog entry must have an upstream version matching what you want to
> build.
>>>> Third, Squeeze is now frozen. Can this version still go into
>>>> unstable, or
>>>> does it have to go into experimental?
>>> I see several changes, so experimental would be the right place [2].
>> There are several changes, although seen from my perspective, 1.1.2
>> contain quite important bug fixes, and I find it both more stable and
>> more tested than 1.1.1. Commenting on Launchpad bug #636473, I'm all
>> for having 1.1.2 in Maverick.
> What could help is to file bugreports against the package currently
> targeted testing, and then tag those bugs as closed by the newer
> release.  That is the easiest way to help the release team judge if an
> exception should be made for this package.

No. What would help the release team is an assessment of the impact the
changes between 1.1.1 and 1.1.2. The fact that bugs are reported or not
is not really relevant.

Felipe Sateler

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to