Le lundi 13 septembre 2010 05:51:15, Reinhard Tartler a écrit : > On Fr, Sep 10, 2010 at 23:02:05 (CEST), Romain Beauxis wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I just realized that the binNMU of libbjack-ocaml(-dev) was not > > sufficient because libbjack-ocaml-dev declares a dependency on > > libjack-dev. > > Sorry? I don't follow. can you please elaborate why this doesn't work?
Sorry, I should have been more precise.. > > I think it is reasonable to have a dependency on the -dev package of a > > library when installing the corresponding ocaml -dev binding, so I want > > to know what to do now. > > Do the ocaml jack bindings work with both jackd1 and jackd2? or do they > require a specific flavor? what about potential other jack > implementations like tschack? The bindings do not require any particular flavor. The problem is that any program using libbjack-ocaml must compile against it, thus installing libbjack-ocaml-dev. libbjack-ocaml-dev has a dependency on libjack-dev, which pulls jackd1. I believe that instead one should be able to use any jack implementation for the build. Also, when building liquidsoap inexperimental, I have a failure in cowbuilder because some of the dependencies pull jack2 and ocaml-bjack pulls jack1. Adding a dependency on the developpement package of the corresponding C library in libbjack-ocaml-dev seems a reasonable requirement to me, though I think it has been discussed in that past I think. The straight-forward solution would be to change this dependency to libjack-jackd2-dev | libjack-dev but I would like to know if this is the solution you would advise. Then, the other questions is: should this be also propagated to testing ? The answer seems to be yes to me but again, I would like to have your input on this. Thanks, Romain _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers