thanks for pointing out this.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote:
> It seems to me that it contains important regression fixes and only few
> things apart from that. If that is correct, I believe it is a good
> candidate for Squeeze, and suggest to target unstable instead and request
> unembargoing from the release team.
Here is the full diff between 1.3.7 and 1.3.4 (currently in testing)
 and here is another diff from which changes to *.po files have
been stripped out .
Many changes have been made, so I'd feel more comfortable to see a
sort of 'long term' support provided by upstream for the 1.3.4
I am going to email the current maintainer about this situation.
Alessio Treglia <ales...@debian.org>
Debian & Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list