2010/10/21 Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk>:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:15:01PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 20:07, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:14:15PM +0000,
>>> danstowell-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
>>>
>>>>   Can build against jack2 as well as jack1
>>>
>>>> - libjack-dev (>= 0.100),
>>>> + libjack-jackd2-0 | libjack-dev (>= 0.100),
>>>
>>> Please beware that the commit message do not match the actual change.
>>>
>>> More accurate description of the change is this:
>>>
>>>  Build against hack2 by default, with the common API as fallback
>>
>> Actually, it means: try to build against the runtime library package
>> and fallback to the jackd1 development headers. In other words, the
>> change is broken.
>
> Oh yes, I totally missed that more important point. :-P

So I've done well then, burying an error underneath a minor
misdemeanour! Thanks for the feedback, I've pushed a fix. I'm grateful
for the observations.

Dan

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to