On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:39:07AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 07:08, Adrian Knoth <a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:18:23PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:

> We need not change anything now, just use a more meaningful tag > than "" next time we want to bump.

I think this makes most sense. (although it does require renaming libjack-dev to libjack-jackd1-dev and making it Provide: libjack-dev).

Is that required now? I don't think so. Policy 7.5:

[elaboration snipped]

So long story short: it seems the only change reguired right now is the updated jackd2 package with libjack-jackd2-dev "Provides: libjack-dev".

And that's already built and waiting for an upload on my system. Just give me the "OK" in case you agree. ;)

Yes. But when libjack${tag}-dev appears, libjack-dev needs to be renamed to something less generic, to allow people to require jackd1 if they really need to.

I think noone disagrees with that. Note "right now" and similar expressions in Adrians text that you quoted here above. :-)

 - Jonas

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to