On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 10:36:54AM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:51:11AM +0000, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
  dh-autoreconf is enough

Enough what? Lines consumed in the rules file?!?

Replacing CDBS with short-form dh is a change of packaging style.

It was the original intention of Jaromír.

Jaromír, isn'it?

Ah, ok.

I am not arguing against ditching CDBS here (although I am of course sad every time I see it happen), just the notion of dh being "enough" compared to CDBS.

So no need to prove to me the sanity of the change. I guess I understand now what lies beneath that phrase of yours.


 - Jonas

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to