On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:11, Aaron M. Ucko <u...@debian.org> wrote:
> Vincent Bernat <ber...@debian.org> writes:
>> listener. Moreover, this is not 100% reliable.

OK, then we will avoid unoconv. Thanks Vincent.

> I was afraid there might be further complications with unoconv/OO.o,
> hence my suggestion to split the package (which would, however, require
> another pass through NEW. :-/)
> Another possibility might be to use ooo2dbk in conjunction with
> docbook-utils, dblatex, or the like.
>> Maybe this is is better to keep the documentation in sxw format?
> Perhaps, though I'd suggest trying to keep the PDF if feasible.

The pdf comes with upstream tarball, we were just regenerating it out
of principle. I think we can just install the upstream provided one.


Felipe Sateler

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to