On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:20, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:23:44AM +0000,
> eighthave-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
>>
>>   updated changelog with fixes
>>
>> diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
>> index 1cd698f..a95db68 100644
>> --- a/debian/changelog
>> +++ b/debian/changelog
>> @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
>> pd-ext13 (0.17.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
>>
>>  * Initial release (Closes: #591844)
>> +  * expanded description to include object listing
>> +  * removed mistakenly commited build log
>> +  * added linux-libc-dev as Build-Dep for cdrom.h and soundcard.h
>
> An initial packaging release really contains no "changes", except the fact
> that it is released, and related info (bug closure and perhaps mentioning
> which Debian suite is targeted).

I have no strong opinion on this, other than the trailer line should
be updated to (as Reinhardt mentioned before) the point where you
believe the package is ready to be uploaded. This is because, if
someone did the most work, I prefer to keep that name in the trailer
line instead of mine (yes, I know I can do it manually, but lets
define the process correctly).

>
> Also, VCS-only juggling back and forth is irrelevant to pass on to the
> changelog for the resulting source package.  In other words: Even if this
> was not an initial release, the note on removing (a.k.a. reverting the
> addition of) build log should be stripped.

This I agree with.


-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to