On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 10:24 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:20, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:23:44AM +0000,
> > eighthave-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
> >> updated changelog with fixes
> >> diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
> >> index 1cd698f..a95db68 100644
> >> --- a/debian/changelog
> >> +++ b/debian/changelog
> >> @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
> >> pd-ext13 (0.17.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
> >> * Initial release (Closes: #591844)
> >> + * expanded description to include object listing
> >> + * removed mistakenly commited build log
> >> + * added linux-libc-dev as Build-Dep for cdrom.h and soundcard.h
> > An initial packaging release really contains no "changes", except the fact
> > that it is released, and related info (bug closure and perhaps mentioning
> > which Debian suite is targeted).
> I have no strong opinion on this, other than the trailer line should
> be updated to (as Reinhardt mentioned before) the point where you
> believe the package is ready to be uploaded. This is because, if
> someone did the most work, I prefer to keep that name in the trailer
> line instead of mine (yes, I know I can do it manually, but lets
> define the process correctly).
> > Also, VCS-only juggling back and forth is irrelevant to pass on to the
> > changelog for the resulting source package. In other words: Even if this
> > was not an initial release, the note on removing (a.k.a. reverting the
> > addition of) build log should be stripped.
> This I agree with.
Ok, I like how Jacob describes it, so I purged all change comments from
this initial release and pushed.
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list