On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 10:24 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:20, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:23:44AM +0000, > > eighthave-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: > >> > >> updated changelog with fixes > >> > >> diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog > >> index 1cd698f..a95db68 100644 > >> --- a/debian/changelog > >> +++ b/debian/changelog > >> @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@ > >> pd-ext13 (0.17.1-1) unstable; urgency=low > >> > >> * Initial release (Closes: #591844) > >> + * expanded description to include object listing > >> + * removed mistakenly commited build log > >> + * added linux-libc-dev as Build-Dep for cdrom.h and soundcard.h > > > > An initial packaging release really contains no "changes", except the fact > > that it is released, and related info (bug closure and perhaps mentioning > > which Debian suite is targeted). > > I have no strong opinion on this, other than the trailer line should > be updated to (as Reinhardt mentioned before) the point where you > believe the package is ready to be uploaded. This is because, if > someone did the most work, I prefer to keep that name in the trailer > line instead of mine (yes, I know I can do it manually, but lets > define the process correctly). > > > > > Also, VCS-only juggling back and forth is irrelevant to pass on to the > > changelog for the resulting source package. In other words: Even if this > > was not an initial release, the note on removing (a.k.a. reverting the > > addition of) build log should be stripped. > > This I agree with.
Ok, I like how Jacob describes it, so I purged all change comments from this initial release and pushed. .hc _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers