On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:48:52AM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Fabian Greffrath <fab...@greffrath.com> wrote:
Am 20.11.2010 12:37, schrieb Alessio Treglia:

Oh god, I made a mistake.
I get a lot of confusion while trying to re-upload the package, maybe
I've switched to the wrong git branch.

You've messed up the changelog, IMHO it's not that bad and can be fixed in
the next upload. ;)

Yes, it is: I ap

What's a bit worse is that the new package revision contains the rather
intrusive bpa-stdin patch. I fear this will make it harder to convince the
RT to include this revision of the faad2 package in queeze. We should have
reverted it beforehand and only upload with the two minor fixes (my path_max
patch and your pointer_size one).

I'd suggest to upload another package 2.7-6 with the following changes:

* Fix debian/changelog for 2.7-5
* Unapply bpa-stdin.patch (but maybe keep it in the package)

And then request a freeze exception with the debdiff between 2.7-4 and

As alternative, we could upload a 2.7-4+squeeze1 release to t-p-u,
what do you think?

This is bad: t-p-u does not get the same exposure and automated testing time before sliding into testing. This means a higher burden on the Release team for such uploads, and likely less interest in acceptance due to the weaker testing process!

 - Jonas

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to