-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 11/25/2010 05:48 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:04:38PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:45:20AM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>>> On 11/24/2010 12:57 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>>>> so how should i proceed from here?
>>>> - just remove the debian/copyright_hints completely and be happy
>>>> with what i got so far?
>> You should be _concerned_ with what copyright-check helped you
>> discover. Even if dislike how it works and later trash that routine.
> ...but looking at actual files I cannot see that the Apple copyright
> that you talk about - just a false alarm triggered by scanning binary
> code. So I now suppressed checking those files, and dropped their
> mentioning in the copyright file (assuming they are copyright same code
> authors and licensed similarly to the code.
no, it was a true alarm (actually 2, see my other mail)
however, upstream released a new version (hence "patch2") with fixed files
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list