On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 06:12:04PM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 11/25/2010 05:48 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:04:38PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:45:20AM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 11/24/2010 12:57 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
so how should i proceed from here?
- just remove the debian/copyright_hints completely and be happy
with what i got so far?

You should be _concerned_ with what copyright-check helped you
discover.  Even if dislike how it works and later trash that routine.

...but looking at actual files I cannot see that the Apple copyright that you talk about - just a false alarm triggered by scanning binary code. So I now suppressed checking those files, and dropped their mentioning in the copyright file (assuming they are copyright same code authors and licensed similarly to the code.

no, it was a true alarm (actually 2, see my other mail)
however, upstream released a new version (hence "patch2") with fixed files

Ah, ok :-)

 - Jonas

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to