2010/12/3 IOhannes zmölnig <zmoel...@iem.at>: > hi all, > > based on previous suggestion i started to create a (debian native) > package "pd-pkg-tools", which should make packaging of pd-libraries easier.
Great! > > currently it only contains new snippets for cdbs, but on the long run > i'd like to have dh-shortform makefile snippets as well. > > the package itself uses CDBS. > > i haven't filed an ITP yet (is there any difference between a > debian/native package and a normal "upstream" package, regarding debian > policy?...probably i should just have a look at the dp :-)) > > also i don't know whether this is a welcome addition to pkg-multimedia. > therefore, for the time being, i have only pushed the package to my > repository at github: > https://github.com/umlaeute/pd-pkg-tools I would welcome it. > > so if somebody could have a look i would be grateful. > esp, my cdbs knowledge is probably not very sophisticated (yet), so i > might have done all the DONTs (e.g. i still have no real clue what is > supposed to go into "class" and what should go into "rules") I think this should go into rules, but Jonas can give a more informed answer. > > so far i have packaged one very simple pd-library with it, and the > debian/rules file boils down to 3 lines (without the boiler-plate). > > this package (pd-syslog) is currently also on github > https://github.com/umlaeute/pd-syslog > since i was unsure about it's hard dependency on pd-pkg-tools. > > comments please The documentation is a bit wrong: The pd Depends is not handled yet. Maybe the Depends should be expanded to a new substvar? Wild wishlist... would it be possible to detect if the installed pd patches/objects use another library? So that the appropriate depends are added? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers