On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 04:16:07PM +0100, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:
On 12/03/2010 03:23 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
convince the maintainers of CDBS and debhelper, respectively, to adopt in in their packages, rather than maintaining this special-purpose package.

well, i thought it would probably be of minor interest to the entirety of DDs using cdbs to have pd-specific parts in it (it's not that i expect a use as wide as with perl or python).

I can't imagine how anyone would be annoyed by not only major but also minor packaging patterns supported in main CDBS package as opposed to add-on packages.

Also, I strongly suspect that CDBS add-on packages generally use fewer of the evolving CDBS features than those part of CDBS itself.

With my CDBS maintainer hat on, I'd be happy to adopt the CDBS parts into CDBS itself!

this of course would make long term maintainance easier...

My thinking too.

But ultimately it is your decision.  There is no single truth to this.

 - Jonas

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to