On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Alessio Treglia <ales...@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> The upload would be: >> >> version-N+dfsgX > > It had better set something similar to: > > version-N~dfsg > > This makes us able to drop the ~dfsg component if upstream will decide > to release another DFSG-clean tarball in future.
Ahhh, that makes sense. Just for my own personal education here ( since I'm still learning ), will dpkg fail if: 1.0-1+dfsg3 not get overriden by: 1.0-2 ( I used 3 to try to force the condition that I'm thinking about ) > > Cheers. > > -- > Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com > Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org > Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com > 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 > Thanks so much! -Paul -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list email@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers