On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 09:59:45AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I do prefer CDBS. But since I do not plan to do regular work on this
> package (and you do), I think your opinion on this matter weights more
> than mine. I do volunteer to do the switch to CDBS if that is your
> choice, though.

I don't have much experience with CDBS (neither with dh though), but if you 
do the hard work I'm fine. So please do it.

> Please submit it, so that others benefit from Gurkan's work too.


> Ah yes. The description (and name) of the patch is misleading then.

Right, I changed that.

> is there a reason that work was not incorporated here?

Yes. It included some non-free sources (the lha code) and another directory
(autom4te.cache) I preferred to remove from orig.tar. Also, it didn't 
integrate the work already done in git to clean up the package (removing 
the bundled libraries, using the 3.0 (quilt) format and other changes to 
packaging stuff). I found easier to start "from scratch" instead of 
upgrading that version.

perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{...@_]};and s;\S+;<inidehG ordnasselA>;eg;say~~reverse'

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to