On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 01:35:22PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:09, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 02:54:15PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:

On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 09:59:45AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:

I do prefer CDBS. But since I do not plan to do regular work on this
package (and you do), I think your opinion on this matter weights more than
mine. I do volunteer to do the switch to CDBS if that is your choice,

I don't have much experience with CDBS (neither with dh though), but if
you do the hard work I'm fine. So please do it.

I'd be happy too to help with the switch (as with any other CDBS-specific
tuning later on as well).  Just tell me explicitly if needed.

Or put differently: I'll wait for an explicitl "go!" from Felipe, to avoid
us doing double work :-)

I've pushed the basic switch (autotools + debhelper). Since you are more familiar with the get-orig-source rule, please you do it.


I am uncertain how happy others here are about other changes that I would wanna do - starting with enabling build-dependency auto-resolving a.k.a. that debian/control.in file discussed tonight regarding a PureData package. So I hesitate doing more work just now.

 - Jonas

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to