On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:08, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 01:51:13PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 12:55:04 (CET), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> Are anyone else not admins?  If so, I suggest either we decide on a
>>> public policy on our reasoning for differentiating, or (preferrably) have
>>> everyone be admins at Alioth: We do use distributed VCS for all our work, so
>>> noone really can do much harm, I believe.
>> I'd prefer to go with the principle of least priviledge, which means that
>> admin status is only granted if someone requires or asks for it. I've
>> noticed that you repond rather quickly to new introductions for prospective
>> members, so having you as admin just makes sense to me.
>> OTOH, I'd encourage everyone that currently has admin status to consider
>> dropping it in case he doesn't require it.
> Then let me put it upside down: What extra responsibilities am I now
> burdenend with, compared to those not admins in this team?

You can now accept other team members, and can edit the project page on alioth.

> I would like us to be as equal as possible in this team.  We are not equal
> outside of the team (some of us have access to upload to Debian, Ubuntu,
> Skolelinux or other places, some are rich, some get laid etc.) but I fail to
> see the need for multiple access levels here in this team.

I don't really see the point either, but I don't really care. It's not
like we use the alioth page for much stuff... I won't spend the time
setting everyone to admin status, but I won't complain if somebody
else does.

BTW, if someone wants to do some MIA hunting on this team, it would be
cool so that we can easily check out the active members of the team.


Felipe Sateler

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to