On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 06:16:50PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> - libjack-dev >> + libjack-dev (>= 1:0.118+svn4089-1~) | libjack-jackd2-dev (>= >> 1.9.6~dfsg.1-3~) > Is this really necessary? I thought it was handled by a wrapper?!?
Wasn't the idea to give named tags? Something like libjack-dev-session or libjack-session-dev, and all the jackd implementations supporting this tag will provide it? If so, we simply decide on such a name now and I'll upload fixed jackd packages to experimental tonight? Cheers -- mail: a...@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers