On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:00:53PM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 4:33 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoel...@iem.at> wrote:
and according to what i found in the internet [1] one should indeed use both together...


Mmhh... My experience with DH 7 and dh-autoreconf says different, one must not use both dh_autoreconf and dh_autotools_dev, but only one. But we are using CDBS and I don't know how it should behave (Jonas, help us! Help us! :)).

You chose to use dh_autoreconf, apparently because it seems easier to you than what I propose as the most elegant approach I am aware of.

Personally I do not like dh_autoreconf. One reason is its (arguable) affect on backporting. Another is its too simple CDBS integration.

IOhannes seem to now realize some limitations in that CDBS integration. I cannot magically make those go away. I suggest to file a bugreport against dh_autoreconf and not use it for now.

But that's just a suggestion - good luck with your adventure :-)


 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to