I'm still confused about this. Please not that I'm not the maintainer
nor anyone else offical for the package, so it's safe to just ignore me.

If you think this is a libroar bug please reassign the bug to libroar
but I do not yet see where libdnet and #608807 come into play. Can you
please clearify this? libdnet does not depend or recommend on any

 (Rah of PH2)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to