On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:14:39PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
2011/2/18 Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk>:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 07:40:26PM +0000, mira-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org

+Format: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?op=file&rev=166
+Upstream-Name: specimen
+Upstream-Contact: Pete Bessman <ninjadr...@gazuga.net>
+ Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <e...@zhevny.com>
+Source: http://zhevny.com/specimen/downloads.html
+Copyright: 2005 Pete Bessman <ninjadr...@sgazuga.net>
+License: GPL-2+

Are you certain you really want to declare header copyright+licensing?!?

Hi Jonas,

if it is not breaking any rules I would keep it.

Why do you want to keep it?

My question was (and still is) if you are aware what it is you declare?

there is not any year for Eric who is current upstream maintainer.
Any idea which year I should give to his name? 2011? Or just keep it like it is?

I'd say be accurate - i.e. keep as-is if there is no more info, but also don't invent info that does not exist!

Better yet: Contact upstream and ask for clarification. I believe that in some jurisdictions (particularly in the US) a legal disclaimer is not binding if it lacks years of claimed coverage. Upstream may appreciate a friendly notice on improvements to their legal hints.

 - Jonas

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to