On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:29:35PM +1100, Luke Yelavich wrote:

> Greetings all.

Hi!

> If the team decides to not maintain this package, then we need to
> either make sure the package gets a maintainer in Debian from
> somewhere, or, we talk to Upstream about alternative solutions. I
> understand and accept in advance any reasons given to not take over
> maintainership of dbus-c++.

Let me add the following statement from ffado-devel to the discussion:

   http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=26942187

---
maybe the unbundling of dbus-c++ was premature.  Upstream appear not to
do any releases nor do they seem to have arrived at a stable API yet.
And downstreams have source incompatible versions of it or don't have it
at all.
---

If we arrive at the conclusion that dbus-c++ is unmaintainable, I'm happy
to re-add the embedded dbus-c++ bits upstream. Though I have commit
rights, we could also do it locally with a quilt patch.


Just my €0.02


Cheers

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to