On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 02:49:17PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:

> > Or am I missing something?
> No, you aren't :)
> Since I'd like to add a note about the lash2ladish transition, what
> about mentioning the changes introduced to make jackd2 cooperate with
> ladish?

Sounds reasonable, especially to indicate to users that they don't have
to recompile a patched version of jackd2 if they want to use ladish.

>From a user's perspective, it's "apt-get install ladish", and that's
something good, something that we can "sell".


The jackd2 change itself is pretty simple: we just diff'ed mainline
jackd2 against the patched branch and included this patch. Luckily, it's
nothing more than this additional code which won't do any harm in
non-ladish mode.

I wonder why upstream doesn't merge these two branches. I'll talk to
them. ;)



Cheers

-- 
mail: a...@thur.de      http://adi.thur.de      PGP/GPG: key via keyserver

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to