Hi Alexander, On 11-04-19 at 11:15am, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > Am 19.04.2011 08:45, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: > > >> while I *highly appreciate* your timely acceptance of the vo-aacenc > >> package (AAC is an MPEG specification after all), I still fail to > >> see why very similar packages like lame are left unattended in the > >> NEW queue for 9 months now! > > Do you consider that a good way to start a productive discussion, or > you just want to dump some heat? > > If it's the second, I recommend to stop reading here, and send all > your replies to /dev/null. Thanks in advance! > > And just for the record: lame hasn't been left unattended in the NEW > queue. Just because something waits there, doesn't mean we ignore it > and don't do anything with it.
This news on the matter is highly appreciated. Thanks a lot! I agree it is not a nice way of putting it here above by Reinhard, but I believe there have been several nice attempts to get a status from the ftpmasters in the past, which have been met with silence. Kind regards, and thanks for all the great work you do! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers