Hi Alexander,

On 11-04-19 at 11:15am, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Am 19.04.2011 08:45, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
> >> while I *highly appreciate* your timely acceptance of the vo-aacenc 
> >> package (AAC is an MPEG specification after all), I still fail to 
> >> see why very similar packages like lame are left unattended in the 
> >> NEW queue for 9 months now!
> Do you consider that a good way to start a productive discussion, or 
> you just want to dump some heat?
> If it's the second, I recommend to stop reading here, and send all 
> your replies to /dev/null.  Thanks in advance!
> And just for the record: lame hasn't been left unattended in the NEW 
> queue.  Just because something waits there, doesn't mean we ignore it 
> and don't do anything with it.

This news on the matter is highly appreciated.  Thanks a lot!

I agree it is not a nice way of putting it here above by Reinhard, but I 
believe there have been several nice attempts to get a status from the 
ftpmasters in the past, which have been met with silence.

Kind regards, and thanks for all the great work you do!

 - Jonas

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to