Hi Alexander,

Am 19.04.2011 02:15, schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl:
Do you consider that a good way to start a productive discussion, or you
just want to dump some heat?
If it's the second, I recommend to stop reading here, and send all your
replies to /dev/null.  Thanks in advance!

I did not intend to write such a harsh email to you and I am sorry it turns out I did. It's just that I am frustrated because of the lack of tranparency with regard to this topic from the ftp-masters side (take for example the complete lack of any statement in the two years course of #522373) and this frustration solidified in the way I chose my words.

It was indeed my intention to start a productive discussion and elicit a statement from your side like the one that follows. ;)

And just for the record:  lame hasn't been left unattended in the NEW
queue.  Just because something waits there, doesn't mean we ignore it
and don't do anything with it.

Alright, that's good to know. But if a certain group of packages takes a lot longer than others to proceed the NEW queue this suggests that these packages are ignored on purpose. Furthermore there has not been any communication with us maintainers at all. If there are issues that you check and discuss it would be nice to keep us informed at least.

Best Regards,

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to