On 11-05-10 at 11:14pm, Rogério Brito wrote:
> BTW, regarding LAME, since a good amount of the active developers 
> prefer to use CVS, while I like git (the little that I know of git), I 
> maintain a very outdated, half-broken, and unofficial mirror of LAME 
> here:
>     https://github.com/rbrito/lame
> I would like to start over the right way and, perhaps, it would be a 
> good idea to keep it under the pkg-multimedia-maintainers umbrella. 
> What do you guys think of that?

Generally I recommend strictly separating upstream and packaging 
projects, if that is what you mean.

If you mean where and how to handle the _packaging_ of LAME, then 
certainly I find it most sensible to store it together with the rest of 
the projects maintained in this team :-)

Regards, and welcome,

 - Jonas

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to