On 11-05-10 at 11:14pm, Rogério Brito wrote: > BTW, regarding LAME, since a good amount of the active developers > prefer to use CVS, while I like git (the little that I know of git), I > maintain a very outdated, half-broken, and unofficial mirror of LAME > here: > > https://github.com/rbrito/lame > > I would like to start over the right way and, perhaps, it would be a > good idea to keep it under the pkg-multimedia-maintainers umbrella. > What do you guys think of that?
Generally I recommend strictly separating upstream and packaging projects, if that is what you mean. If you mean where and how to handle the _packaging_ of LAME, then certainly I find it most sensible to store it together with the rest of the projects maintained in this team :-) Regards, and welcome, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list email@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers