Alright, then I guess there is nobody listening anymore... :(

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Datum: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:34:16 +0200 (CEST)
Von: [email protected] (Mail Delivery System)
An: [email protected]

This is the mail system at host mail.greffrath.com.

I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.

For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.

If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.

                   The mail system

<[email protected]>: host albiero.videolan.org[88.191.250.118] said: 550 5.1.1 <[email protected]>: Recipient address rejected: User
    unknown in virtual alias table (in reply to RCPT TO command)

Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.greffrath.com
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: E3A6798141
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; [email protected]
Arrival-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:34:12 +0200 (CEST)

Final-Recipient: rfc822; [email protected]
Original-Recipient: rfc822;[email protected]
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: dns; albiero.videolan.org
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 <[email protected]>: Recipient address
    rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table

--- Begin Message ---
Hello libdca developers,

I hope anyone is still listening?

Currently, a bug has been filed in the Debian Bug Tracker [1] about dcadec failing to decode large files. The problem only occurs with files larger than 2GB and only on i386 systems.

It was proposed to add
 CFLAGS += -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
to the environment and rebuild the package and this has reportedly fixed the issue.

Since DTS-encoded audio files larger than 2GB shouldn't be too uncommon, I'd like to see this issue fixed in the Debian package, but preferably also upstream. Do you think it is reasonable to add -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to CFLAGS per default? Or is there any drawback that I couldn't see yet, e.g. ABI change or even worse?

That said, do you think it makes sense to fix the LFS issue discussed here in SVN and then do something crazy like a new release? ;)

 - Fabian


[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639593


--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to