-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-10-03 09:19, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > This is probably not the right place to ask, but why is puredata > packaged in a different team than all the pd-libraries?
mainly because of legacy reasons. the current maintainer (paul), has not shown any inclination on moving the "puredata" package to pkg-multimedia. i think this should be respected. > This is a bit of an unlucky situation. why? if the only reason is to not have to include paul's address in such discussions, then i think it is a rather lame excuse. (apart from that, it is mainly me who is responsible for the changes in question, and you do reach me via this group.) fmgasdr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6JY74ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvRPmgCdFIGsmRC8nepWrtj5nmxxUsbx bEMAnRuKVC42fKxaI1kKOGMkF64nqWFL =3U/R -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
