On 12-02-10 at 09:19am, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 09.02.2012 17:34, schrieb Alessio Treglia: > >Do you mean FAAC links against libmp4v2? If so, we could try to make > >it rely on a dlopen() based mechanism. > > For the initial upload to Debian we could simply configure > --without-mp4v2. BTW, the library is not affected, only the CLI > frontend. I assume it will be OK to ship both sources in the same > tarball as long as they are not linked together? > > OTOH, I am still not sure what happens when you link GPL and MPL > code. I have read > <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#MPL-2.0> but did > not understand a word. :/
Then ask for help interpreting it at d-legal@ :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
