On 12-02-21 at 12:11am, Alessio Treglia wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> > wrote: > > "New [ladish] packages are currently available in Debian unstable" - > > and also in testing now. Should we adjust or perhaps better > > simplify to not mention explicitly migration status: Subject is > > "planned for Wheezy" which covers it. > > I've made some adjustments, please review. > > > "[LAME is...] in the main distribution, without having to resort to > > unofficial repositories." Seems unnecessary to mention unofficial > > repositories, as they are not "the main distribution". > > Mmm.. no, I don't agree, I'd like to highlight the point: "Happy news > guys! LAME has joined Debian, hence as of now you don't need to rely > on dmo anymore!" :)
Yeah, I read the message between the lines ;-) Problem is that saying "you no longer need dmo in Wheezy" implies "you need dmo in Squeeze" which is misleading. I believe that we currently deal with dmo by treating it as non-existent and just close bugreports infected by it. I'd prefer similar here. ...but as I wrote originally, it is a minor thing, so if important to you to keep it as-is, I'll rest my case :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
