[resent to proper list] On 12-02-18 at 05:02pm, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: > There is no need to bump dh requirement to 9, cdbs does not > actually need it so higher.
> cdbs (>= 0.4.93~), > - debhelper (>= 9), > + debhelper (>= 8.1.3~), No need to tighten debhelper build-dependency _at_ _all_ due to multiarch when using CDBS: Please just use CDBS auto-resolved unversioned debhelper, unless you know better. ...and if you do know better, then please declare in CDBS auto-resolveable way like this in debian/rules: # needs recent debhlper to satisfy foo with bar CDBS_BUILD_DEPENDS += , debhelper (>= z.y.x~) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
