On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 06:06:56PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > How do you define "resulting program wouldn't be very useful"?
Please, Jonas, don't get me wrong! ;-) In my poor english I was trying to explain that maybe, at this point of feature enabling (Cycles support), there are not so many Blender fans running ia64 or s390/s390x machines. Most of them are running amd64/i386 boxes, instead. Since Cycles support in Blender is strictly related to OpenImageIO library (which I'm maintaining within Debian PhotoTools Team) and it's still failing in a lot of architectures (all but [any-amd64] [any-i386] ia64 and s390/s390x), I thought it was wise enough not to enable it on those not-so-common architectures. It's a temporary choice, waiting for me to fix the other architecture building processes. But that's my idea and maybe it's wrong. Any advice is really appreciated. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers