Yes it does. Am 15.06.2013 00:44 schrieb "Felipe Sateler" <[email protected]>:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Reinhard Tartler <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Felipe Sateler <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Reinhard Tartler <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Felipe Sateler <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:36 PM, <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> The following commit has been merged in the master branch: > >>>>> commit 27b3130d6ea719a3470c2d9a8f552657cb3d72c5 > >>>>> Author: Jaromír Mikeš <[email protected]> > >>>>> Date: Fri Jun 14 00:45:12 2013 +0200 > >>>>> > >>>>> Dont sign tags > >>>> > >>>> Why did you do this? Tags are better signed > >>> > >>> For folks like me, who do not have their GPG keys on the development > >>> machines, having this in the configuration is just annoying. > >>> > >>> please set this to your ~/.gbp.conf instead if you want this behavior, > >>> but please do not force this policy to others. > >>> > >>> Thanks for your understanding. > >> > >> And how do you upload if you don't have the GPG key? > > > > I usually ssh to some other machine, where I work on the package. When > > I'm happy with it, I "debsign -r $host:$pathtochanges" and can then > > continue to dput the package. > > OK thanks for the explanation. If it causes trouble, then lets not > sign them. Does gbp generate annotated tags? > > > -- > > Saludos, > Felipe Sateler >
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
