2013/9/8 Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]> > Quoting Jaromír Mikeš (2013-09-08 08:00:03) >
> > Ops sorry ... waf.patch shouldn't be removed but renamed to > 0001-waf.patch > > ... I didn't push new file :( > > Better IMO to avoid renaming, to ease locating patches by reading > changelog. > > Here are some advices about patch naming/numbering: > > * Use the patch naming micro policy, and include its README. > * When adding a patch, mention its number and purpose in changelog. > * When dropping a patch, mention at least its number. > * If renumbering (if you really must), mention old and new number. > * Mention numbers explicitly (not e.g. ranges) to ease grep'ing. > Hi Jonas, I agree with all. I am big fan of numbered patches. Just I think that renumbering is harmless in this case because package is unreleased and changelog is clean. mira
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
