2014-04-28 17:55 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš <[email protected]>: > 2014-04-28 17:33 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia <[email protected]>: > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Jaromír Mikeš <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > E: petri-foo: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl >> > N: >> > N: This package appears to be covered by the GNU GPL but depends on >> the >> > N: OpenSSL libssl package and does not mention a license exemption or >> > N: exception for OpenSSL in its copyright file. The GPL (including >> > version >> > N: 3) is incompatible with some terms of the OpenSSL license, and >> > therefore >> > N: Debian does not allow GPL-licensed code linked with OpenSSL >> libraries >> > N: unless there is a license exception explicitly permitting this. >> > N: >> > N: If only the Debian packaging, or some other part of the package >> not >> > N: linked with OpenSSL, is covered by the GNU GPL, please add a >> lintian >> > N: override for this tag. Lintian currently has no good way of >> > N: distinguishing between that case and problematic packages. >> > N: >> > N: Severity: serious, Certainty: wild-guess >> > N: >> > N: Check: copyright-file, Type: binary >> >> The warning is self-explanatory. Remove the build-dep on libssl, then >> either: >> >> 1. Try to build it with libgnutls-dev instead >> 2. Ask upstream to avoid linking against it directly; he could use dlopen >> for it >> >> Cheers! >> >> > > Build with libgnutls-dev doesn't work so I asked upstream for using dlopen. >
I guess we have to wait for upstream fix now? mira
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
