On 04/24/2015 05:01 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > > 2015-04-24 15:39 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > On 24 April 2015 at 06:30, Jaromír Mikeš <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > > > > > Would be great if someone can review package and if everything fine > upload. > > I cannot review as I am too short on time. However, if others review > and agree that it is OK for upload then I can do the signing/upload. > Hi Felipe & mira, Finally I had a good chance to review ntk. I found a few things which I just pushed to alioth: 1. Fixed clean target to remove *.pyc files left behind by waf 2. Switched Vcs URL to cgit 3. Added a README.Debian explaining the waf-light 1.6.11 v 1.8.8 issue 4. Added a gbp.conf file & upstream metadata Actually, I don't see why it couldn't be released to unstable rather than experimental as it is NEW anyway and is mainly for use by the other "non" packages to come. The changelog still says "UNRELEASED". Looks "good to go" to me! Cheers, Ross
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
