2015-05-09 22:22 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey <[email protected]>: > Hi IOhannes, > > 2015-05-09 21:56 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]>: >> On 05/09/2015 04:34 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >>> >>> It might have ended in some spam filter, at least I suspect that's the >>> reason the mail didn't make it to the list. >> >> most mailman mailinglists do not like it, if you have tons of CCs in the >> mail (after all, mailinglists are there to prevent that kind of behaviour). >> of course there are exceptions (like your mail in questions), but >> mailman wouldn't know about that :-) >> >>> Probably most have no particular preference either way. >> >> "probably most have a strong preference for libav." >> >> really, i have absolutely no clue what they prefer, but we should not >> try to second guess them. >> if they don't react, then we have to try harder (rather than assume that >> they will be fine with whatever I prefer). > " if they don't react, then we don't have to try harder" > It is maintainers' responsibility to read emails sent to their address > set in their packages. I have spent enough time on RC bugs and MIA > cases to have a mental one week timeout on packaging related emails. > > It is simple: If you are not there to answer in a week, your possible > opinion is ignored (unless you are on VAC which has been announced on > private@). > > I don't have infinite time to be spent of unreachable maintainers, but > if you would like to ask them feel free to ping them again. I appreciate that you care about people's opinion and I feel the same generally, but when they don't care about there packages enough to read related emails why should I care better?
We can reasonably expect that the transition does not cause any regression, usually only the opposite (ffmpeg -> libav) does. Cheers, Balint _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
