On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:15:04AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > There are multiple ways to handle packages unsuitable for long-term > maintenance: > > * Treat as "experimental" - e.g. mpv
How is mpv unsuitable for long-term maintainance? > * Have security team treat as "too unreliable" - e.g. iceweasel We do provide security support for iceweasel. Where did you get the idea that we don't? We don't backport fixes but just provide the latest stable release. The situation with ffmpeg is completely different though, because ffmpeg upstream actually documents which patches fix what security issue: http://ffmpeg.org/security.html Something that libav upstream doesn't do. Cheers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
