Hi Jonas, 2015-07-13 15:15 GMT+03:00 Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk>: >> GitHub-style (```) code blocks are not standardized, so Pandoc has the >> full rights to not support it. >> Python-Markdown supports it via a non-default extension. > > Seems indeed it is standardized: > http://spec.commonmark.org/0.20/#fenced-code-blocks
CommonMark ≠ Markdown (i.e. John Gruber even asked them to change the name). > ...so perhaps (if interested in keep using pandoc) simply a matter of > choosing the correct flavor of Markdown parsing? > > Even if it wasn't standardized, pandoc aims to cover a rich variety of > Markdown parsing, including several non-standard but popular extensions > - so I would expect upstream to be interested in fixing also this one if > needed. Please do consider filing a bug against pandoc, even if you do > not want to use pandoc yourself in the future. Apparently pandoc has an extension to support such code blocks [1], so no bug needed. [1]: http://pandoc.org/demo/example19/Extension-fenced_005fcode_005fattributes.html Anyway, because of #792287 the switch to Python-Markdown is better anyway. Sebastian, thanks for taking care of this so quickly! -- Dmitry Shachnev _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers