2016-10-02 11:09 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mi...@gmail.com>: > 2016-10-02 10:48 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) > <umlae...@debian.org>: >> >> >> Am 01. Oktober 2016 22:49:01 MESZ, schrieb "Jaromír Mikeš" >> <mira.mi...@gmail.com>: >>>Hi, >>> >>>I have tried to get repacked ardour 5.4 source but get repacked >>>without dfsg suffix. >>>uscan >>>uscan --repack >>>What is right way? >> >> I usually do: >> $ gbp import-orig --uscan >> >> and manually add the dfsg suffix when being asked for the version. > > With little fix in watch file is dfsg suffix now added on uscan. > But gbp import-orig fail ... :( no idea why > > ardour$ gbp import-orig --pristine-tar --uscan > gbp:info: Launching uscan... > uscan: Newest version of ardour on remote site is 5.4, local version is > 5.3~dfsg > (mangled local version is 5.3) > uscan: => Newer package available from > http://community.ardour.org/srctar > No files matched excluded pattern as the last matching glob: .gitignore > No files matched excluded pattern as the last matching glob: icons/win32/* > gbp:info: using ../ardour_5.4~dfsg.orig.tar.bz2 > What is the upstream version? [5.4~dfsg] > gbp:error: Cannot symlink '../ardour_5.4~dfsg.orig.gbp.tar.bz2' to > '../ardour_5.4~dfsg.orig.tar.bz2': File exists
Can we be bitten by same old bug? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=558777 BTW this workaround importing latest release (tested with simplified watch file from Robin) ... Should we do it this way? $ gbp import-orig --uscan --upstream-version=5.4.0~dfsg best mira _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers