Quoting IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) (2016-11-10 19:00:40) > On 2016-11-10 18:54, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >>> Hmm ... What do you suggest? >>>> Just exclude gitignore file without adding repack suffix to upstream >>>> tarball? >> I suggest you don't repackage. >> Rather have upstream not include that file in their tarball, > > this is certainly best. > until then, i don't see any harm in excluding all ".git*" files without > adding a repack suffix (as recently discussed with the xwax package)
Not sure what was discussed with xwax package (didn't follow that) but there should be no need to repackage source tarball. Instead, suppress the file in git-buildpackage. Reason for that is that a) non-git-managed builds (e.g. official builds on build daemons) are not affected by git hints, but b) our git-managed builds get confused by upstream-infused git hints but we can suppress that locally in our git management tools. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
