Hi Jonas,

On 28/06/2017 13:08, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi luffah,

Quoting luffah (2017-06-28 12:34:27)
Package: inkscape
Version: 0.92.1-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,
    Thank you for your work, as i see the bug stack is high.
    I had a problem which justify to rollback my version of inkscape.

    * What led up to the situation?
         [regression]
         I had files working with previous version of Inkscape on Jessie.
         Now I open and modify the article like files,
         the render is ok in Inkscape, when i export to png the render
         still ok.
         But if i open the svg with an other file previewer (e.g. Comix
         wich is stable) or exporting to pdf, some CSS things are
         corrupted like text colors and offset.
    * What outcome did you expect instead?
         I expect that Inkscape produce PDF output files which conserve
         the render.
Did opening in those same previewers/renderers produce different result
in the past
With the Jessie version of Inkscape,
i don't remember to experience these kind of problem.
That's why i use Inkscape in fact : i need to have a stable
result for producing documents.

It is difficult to compare, given i had made some copy pastes, and
moreover given version difference (inkscape 48 -> 92) which imply
change in file format.

My problem occur with color changing and text properties inside text block.

The good news
(after i uninstalled and tried unsuccesfully to compile
 and reinstalled Inkscape - and having installed Karbon aside),
                        are that i failed to reproduce the issue,
and that i found as a workaround to select and find the part of text with opacity
and modify the opacity.

So if the bug occur, it occurs rarely.
Therefore, I cannot state it is a regression.
The bug may be passed minor. (as a consequence of dist-upgrade ?)
I'll understood if you dismiss it.

Have a nice day.

You describe a bug regardless, but relevant to understand if it is a
regression.


  - Jonas

P.S. I am not the maintainer, just chiming in with a helpful followup
question.


                  '-

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to