2012/11/21 Alberto Luaces <alua...@udc.es>: >> Any clue? Maybe because of the changes of DESTDIR and so on? There >> is no "No space left on device" kind of error, but maybe it's because >> of that (/tmp as tmpfs, and no previous errors for similar >> files/paths). > > I will investigate; in my build, osgdb_serializers_osgparticle.so > compiles and it is also present in the resulting .deb.
I will also try to build today in a different machine. >> Finally, is it needed compat 9 at all, or can the hardening work with >> previous levels with the current rules file? As [I think that] I said >> previously, I am not sure if the change is going to be approved this >> late into the freeze if it's possible to achieve the same effect with >> more intrusive changes. Compat level 9 makes some hardening things >> automatic, but I think that with the following lines that you used is >> possible with 8, not sure with compat 7: >> >> DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1 >> include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk > > The debhelper upgrade to level 9 was one of the things I did on summer. > I don't remember exactly because of lintian or the hardening flags > addition, but somewhere I read that it was advisable to change it. Then > I followed the documentation in order to know how to use the hardening > flags, and at least at the time, the DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS approach was > suggested. > > I'll get back to you with new information. I asked release managers in the other e-mail, so if they give the go-ahead it's better for us. You can defer/avoid investigating until/unless they don't want us to use dh level 9. Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ Pkg-osg-devel mailing list Pkgfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-osg-devel